Key Differences
In short — Pentium G4400 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Pentium G4400 is 1093 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4400
- Performs up to 52% better in League of Legends than Core i3-3240T - 79 vs 52 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Up to 73% cheaper than Pentium G4400 - $18.79 vs $69.68
- Up to 59% better value when playing League of Legends than Pentium G4400 - $0.4 vs $0.98 per FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Pentium G4400 - 35 vs 54 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4400 - 4 vs 2 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
79
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.98/FPS
40.816326530612244%
Price, €
€77.35
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for €77.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3829 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
52
65.82278481012658%
Value, €/FPS
€0.4/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.86
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3827 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G4400 | vs | Intel Core i3-3240T |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |