Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper Pentium G4400 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 1128 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G4400.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4400
- Up to 83% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $94.31 vs $548.4
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 54 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 13% better in Dota 2 than Pentium G4400 - 199 vs 176 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4400 - 24 vs 2 threads
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Buy for €104.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76802 minutes ago
Buy for €608.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76804 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
694
54.47409733124019%
Multi-Core
1184
15.884089079688756%
Intel Pentium G4400 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Pentium | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Skylake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |