Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper Pentium G3420 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G3420 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 2433 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G3420.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3420
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - $52.41 vs $343.65
- Up to 84% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Core i9-10900K - $0.28 vs $1.8 per FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 53 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Pentium G3420 - 191 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3420 - 20 vs 2 threads
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
189
98.95287958115183%
Value, €/FPS
€0.28/FPS
100%
Price, €
€58.18
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €58.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 27 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
191
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.8/FPS
15.555555555555555%
Price, €
€381.45
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for €381.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
584
33.39050886220697%
Multi-Core
981
10.706100622067009%
Intel Pentium G3420 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |