Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Pentium G3420 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G3420 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2433 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G3420.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3420
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $15.43 vs $175.48
- Up to 91% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i9-10900F - $0.06 vs $0.65 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 53 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 9% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Pentium G3420 - 301 vs 276 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3420 - 20 vs 2 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
276
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.06/FPS
100%
Price, €
€17.13
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €17.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 69 minutes ago
Buy for €194.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 71 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G3420 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |