Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G3420 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G3420 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 1675 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G3420.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3420
- Up to 69% cheaper than Celeron G4900 - $15.43 vs $49.74
- Up to 69% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron G4900 - $0.1 vs $0.32 per FPS
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 53 vs 54 Watts
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Pentium G3420 - 171 vs 170 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
170
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€17.13
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €17.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3853 minutes ago
Buy for €55.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3853 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G3420 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Pentium | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
53 W | TDP | 54 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |