Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Pentium G3420 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Pentium G3420 is 1220 days older than the more expensive Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3420
- Performs up to 0% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron G3930T - 321 vs 320 FPS
- Up to 46% cheaper than Celeron G3930T - $15.43 vs $28.52
- Up to 50% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Celeron G3930T - $0.05 vs $0.1 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Pentium G3420 - 35 vs 53 Watts
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
321
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.05/FPS
100%
Price, €
€17.13
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €17.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17964 minutes ago
Buy for €31.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17964 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G3420 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Pentium | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
53 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |