Buy on Amazon
€58.18
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Pentium G3420 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G3420 is 272 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3420
- Performs up to 2% better in Elden Ring than Celeron G1610 - 112 vs 110 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 53 vs 55 Watts
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 48% cheaper than Pentium G3420 - $27.05 vs $52.41
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Intel Pentium Processor G3420 3.2 GHz LGA 1150 BX80646G3420
Buy for €58.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 276 minutes ago
Intel Celeron G1610 2.60GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1610
Buy for €30.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 276 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Pentium G3420
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
72.94520547945206%
Multi-Core
739
75.33129459734964%
Intel Pentium G3420 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Pentium | Collection | Celeron |
| Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
53 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.