Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Pentium G3420 outperforms the more expensive FX-4130 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Pentium G3420 is 370 days newer than the more expensive FX-4130.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3420
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than FX-4130 - 192 vs 190 FPS
- Up to 8% cheaper than FX-4130 - $15.43 vs $16.76
- Up to 10% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than FX-4130 - $0.09 vs $0.1 per FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 53 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3420 - 4 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
192
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.09/FPS
100%
Price, €
€17.13
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €17.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 29 minutes ago
Buy for €18.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 29 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G3420 | vs | AMD FX-4130 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
Pentium | Collection | FX |
Haswell | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |