Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G3258 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G3258 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 749 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G3258.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3258
- Up to 37% cheaper than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - $37.55 vs $59.8
- Up to 33% better value when playing F1 22 than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - $0.16 vs $0.24 per FPS
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 53 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 6% better in F1 22 than Pentium G3258 - 271 vs 256 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3258 - 12 vs 2 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
FPS
256
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€41.68
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €41.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
271
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.24/FPS
66%
Price, €
€66.38
62%
FPS Winner
Buy for €66.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 59 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G3258 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Pentium | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Haswell | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |