Buy on Amazon
€40.07
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the cheaper Pentium G3258 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G3258 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 2159 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G3258.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3258
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i5-10600KF - $36.1 vs $90.67
- Up to 57% better value when playing Apex Legends than Core i5-10600KF - $0.15 vs $0.35 per FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 53 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 10% better in Apex Legends than Pentium G3258 - 284 vs 259 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3258 - 12 vs 2 threads
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Pentium G3258
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
FPS
259
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€40.07
100%
Value Winner
Intel G3258 4 Pentium 3.20 GHz 3M Cache 2 Core Processor (BX80646G3258)
Buy for €40.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12677 minutes ago
Core i5-10600KF
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
284
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.35/FPS
42%
Price, €
€100.64
39%
FPS Winner
Intel® Core™ i5-10600KF Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.8 GHz Unlocked Without Processor Graphics LGA 1200 (Intel® 400 Series chipset) 125W
Buy for €100.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12678 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Pentium G3258
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Core i5-10600KF
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G3258 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600KF |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Pentium | Collection | Core i5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 12 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 32.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.