Buy on Amazon
€41.68
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10300 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G3258 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G3258 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10300 is 2159 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G3258.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3258
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i3-10300 - $37.55 vs $335.61
- Up to 72% better value when playing Fortnite than Core i3-10300 - $0.45 vs $1.63 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i3-10300 - 53 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Performs up to 6% better in Fortnite than Pentium G3258 - 228 vs 215 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3258 - 8 vs 2 threads
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Pentium G3258
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
FPS
215
94.2982456140351%
Value, €/FPS
€0.45/FPS
100%
Price, €
€41.68
100%
Value Winner
Intel G3258 4 Pentium 3.20 GHz 3M Cache 2 Core Processor (BX80646G3258)
Buy for €41.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 107 minutes ago
Core i3-10300
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
228
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.63/FPS
27.607361963190186%
Price, €
€372.53
11%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i3-10300 (Base stroke: 3.70GHz; Socket: LGA1200; 65 Watt) Box, BX8070110300
Buy for €372.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 106 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Pentium G3258
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Core i3-10300
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Pentium G3258
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Single-Core
613
39.16932907348243%
Multi-Core
1074
22.39833159541189%
Intel Pentium G3258 | vs | Intel Core i3-10300 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Pentium | Collection | Core i3 |
| Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 32.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.