Key Differences
In short — Pentium G3258 outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G3258 is 546 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3258
- Performs up to 3% better in Battlefield 2042 than Celeron G1620 - 147 vs 143 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 53 vs 55 Watts
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
FPS
147
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.28/FPS
100%
Price, €
€41.68
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €41.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 137 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G3258 | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Pentium | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
53 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |