Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms Pentium G3250T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 407 days newer than Pentium G3250T.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3250T
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 35 vs 51 Watts
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 1% better in No Man's Sky than Pentium G3250T - 159 vs 158 FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
159
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€42.52
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €42.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 155 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G3250T | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Pentium | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |