Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6800K outperforms the cheaper Pentium G3250 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G3250 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6800K is 680 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G3250.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3250
- Up to 41% cheaper than Core i7-6800K - $44.59 vs $75.31
- Up to 35% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i7-6800K - $0.42 vs $0.65 per FPS
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than Intel Core i7-6800K - 53 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6800K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Performs up to 9% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Pentium G3250 - 129 vs 118 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3250 - 12 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
118
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€49.5
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €49.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 184 minutes ago
Buy for €83.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 185 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G3250 | vs | Intel Core i7-6800K |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |