Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Pentium G3250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 1535 days newer than Pentium G3250.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3250
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 53 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 2% better in Monster Hunter: World than Pentium G3250 - 255 vs 251 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3250 - 24 vs 2 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
255
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.2/FPS
100%
Price, €
€561.72
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €561.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G3250 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Pentium | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |