Key Differences
In short — Pentium G3250 outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Pentium G3250 is 875 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3250
- Performs up to 2% better in No Man's Sky than FX-6200 - 159 vs 156 FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 53 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 30% cheaper than Pentium G3250 - $31.32 vs $44.59
- Up to 29% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Pentium G3250 - $0.22 vs $0.31 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3250 - 6 vs 2 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €49.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 147 minutes ago
Buy for €34.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 147 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G3250 | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
Pentium | Collection | FX |
Haswell | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 3 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |