Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms Pentium G3220T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 730 days newer than Pentium G3220T.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3220T
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 35 vs 51 Watts
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 1% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Pentium G3220T - 154 vs 152 FPS
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
154
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€32.39
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €32.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G3220T | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Pentium | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |