Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms the cheaper Pentium G2120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G2120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 2423 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G2120.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G2120
- Up to 9% cheaper than Core i3-9100F - $38.03 vs $41.67
- Up to 3% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i3-9100F - $0.28 vs $0.29 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i3-9100F - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 5% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Pentium G2120 - 158 vs 150 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G2120 - 4 vs 2 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
150
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.28/FPS
100%
Price, €
€42.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €42.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4921 minutes ago
Buy for €46.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4922 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G2120 | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |