Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G2120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G2120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 2038 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G2120.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G2120
- Up to 25% cheaper than Celeron G4900 - $29.25 vs $39.15
- Up to 26% better value when playing Elden Ring than Celeron G4900 - $0.29 vs $0.39 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 1% better in Elden Ring than Pentium G2120 - 112 vs 111 FPS
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Pentium G2120 - 54 vs 55 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
111
99.10714285714286%
Value, €/FPS
€0.29/FPS
100%
Price, €
€32.47
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €32.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 154 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
112
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.39/FPS
74.35897435897435%
Price, €
€43.46
74%
FPS Winner
Buy for €43.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 155 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G2120 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Pentium | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 54 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |