Buy on Amazon
€28.4
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $422
Availability
MSRP in USD: $422
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Pentium G2020 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G2020 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 2976 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G2020.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G2020
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - $25.59 vs $153.55
- Up to 19% better value when playing League of Legends than Core i9-11900F - $0.52 vs $0.64 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900F - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 385% better in League of Legends than Pentium G2020 - 267 vs 55 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G2020 - 16 vs 2 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Pentium G2020
Desktop • Jan 21st, 2013
FPS
55
20%
Value, €/FPS
€0.52/FPS
100%
Price, €
€28.4
100%
Value Winner
Intel Pentium G2020 Processor BX80637G2020
Buy for €28.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 109 minutes ago
Core i9-11900F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
267
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.64/FPS
81%
Price, €
€170.44
16%
FPS Winner
Intel® Core™ i9-11900F Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 5.2 GHz LGA1200 (Intel® 500 Series & Select 400 Series Chipset) 65W
Buy for €170.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 110 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Pentium G2020
Desktop • Jan 21st, 2013
Core i9-11900F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G2020 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 21st, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Pentium | Collection | Core i9 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.