Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper Pentium G2020 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G2020 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 2656 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G2020.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G2020
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - $25.59 vs $73.09
- Up to 61% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i5-10400F - $0.24 vs $0.61 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400F - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 12% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Pentium G2020 - 132 vs 118 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G2020 - 12 vs 2 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 21st, 2013
FPS
118
89%
Value, €/FPS
€0.24/FPS
100%
Price, €
€28.4
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €28.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17439 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
132
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.61/FPS
39%
Price, €
€81.13
35%
FPS Winner
Buy for €81.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17440 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 21st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G2020 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 21st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |