Key Differences
In short — FX-6200 outperforms Pentium 3805U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6200 is 1098 days older than Pentium 3805U.
Advantages of Intel Pentium 3805U
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 15 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Performs up to 1% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Pentium 3805U - 89 vs 88 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium 3805U - 6 vs 2 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Pentium 3805U
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
FX-6200
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium 3805U | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
|---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
| Pentium | Collection | FX |
| Broadwell-U | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 3 |
| 2 | Threads | 6 |
| 1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
