Key Differences
In short — Core Ultra 9 185H outperforms Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core Ultra 9 185H is 1323 days newer than Core i7-10700F.
Advantages of Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
- Performs up to 5% better in Dead Space than Core i7-10700F - 161 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700F - 22 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
153
95.03105590062113%
Value, €/FPS
€1.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€170.44
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €170.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5858 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Dec 14th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1612
67.13869221157852%
Multi-Core
7231
62.96586555207245%
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Dec 14th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ultra 9 | Collection | Core i7 |
METEOR LAKE | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel BGA 2049 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
22 | Threads | 16 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 128EU | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |