Buy on Amazon
€172.05
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms Core M-5Y51 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 2012 days newer than Core M-5Y51.
Advantages of Intel Core M-5Y51
- Consumes up to 94% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700F - 4 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 34% better in War Thunder than Core M-5Y51 - 192 vs 143 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core M-5Y51 - 16 vs 4 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Core i7-10700F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
192
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.9/FPS
100%
Price, €
€172.05
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel® Core™ i7-10700F Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 4.8 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA1200 (Intel® 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for €172.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 197 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Core M-5Y51
Mobile • Oct 27th, 2014
Core i7-10700F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core M-5Y51 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 27th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Core M | Collection | Core i7 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel BGA 1234 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
| 1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
4 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 11.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 5300 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.