Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Core M-5Y10c on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 2201 days newer than Core M-5Y10c.
Advantages of Intel Core M-5Y10c
- Consumes up to 96% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5900X - 4 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 10% better in World of Tanks than Core M-5Y10c - 560 vs 508 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core M-5Y10c - 24 vs 4 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
560
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.43/FPS
100%
Price, €
€239.35
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €239.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 222 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Oct 27th, 2014
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core M-5Y10c | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 5900X |
---|---|---|
Oct 27th, 2014 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Core M | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Broadwell | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel BGA 1234 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
0.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
4 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
8.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 5300 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |