Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9940X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-2600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9940X is 2840 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2600.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9940X
- Performs up to 5% better in World of Tanks than Core i7-2600 - 535 vs 509 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2600 - 28 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i9-9940X - $139.46 vs $709.77
- Up to 80% better value when playing World of Tanks than Core i9-9940X - $0.3 vs $1.47 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i9-9940X - 95 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9940X doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
535
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.47/FPS
20%
Price, €
€787.84
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for €787.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8799 minutes ago
Buy for €154.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8798 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9940X | vs | Intel Core i7-2600 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 4 |
28 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |