Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9940X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4670 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4670 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9940X is 1965 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4670.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9940X
- Performs up to 5% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-4670 - 108 vs 103 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670 - 28 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i9-9940X - $102.01 vs $365.59
- Up to 71% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-9940X - $1.1 vs $3.76 per FPS
- Consumes up to 49% less energy than Intel Core i9-9940X - 84 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9940X doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €405.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 93 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
103
95%
Value, €/FPS
€1.1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€113.23
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €113.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 93 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9940X | vs | Intel Core i5-4670 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 4 |
28 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |