Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9940X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9940X is 16 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9940X
- Performs up to 1% better in F1 22 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 276 vs 273 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 165 vs 180 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 28 vs 24 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i9-9940X - $138.16 vs $709.77
- Up to 80% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i9-9940X - $0.56 vs $2.85 per FPS
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
276
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.85/FPS
19%
Price, €
€787.84
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for €787.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 34 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
273
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.56/FPS
100%
Price, €
€153.36
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €153.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 34 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9940X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Skylake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 12 |
28 | Threads | 24 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |