Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9920X outperforms the cheaper Core i9-7920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-7920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9920X is 404 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-7920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9920X
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i9-7920X - 559 vs 553 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i9-9920X - $218.63 vs $429.54
- Up to 48% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i9-9920X - $0.44 vs $0.85 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i9-9920X - 140 vs 165 Watts
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
559
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.85/FPS
51%
Price, €
€476.79
50%
FPS Winner
Buy for €476.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 141 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
FPS
553
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.44/FPS
100%
Price, €
€242.68
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €242.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 141 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9920X | vs | Intel Core i9-7920X |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 12 |
24 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |