Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i9-9920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-9920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 1538 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-9920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9920X
- Up to 35% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $429.54 vs $658.06
- Up to 28% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i5-13400F - $1.15 vs $1.59 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 10% better in Battlefield IV than Core i9-9920X - 458 vs 415 FPS
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
415
90%
Value, €/FPS
€1.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€476.79
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €476.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 71 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
458
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.59/FPS
72%
Price, €
€730.45
65%
FPS Winner
Buy for €730.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 69 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9920X | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 10 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
165 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |