Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9920X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9920X is 199 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9920X
- Performs up to 11% better in Borderlands 3 than Celeron G4900 - 220 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 24 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 96% cheaper than Core i9-9920X - $17.05 vs $429.54
- Up to 95% better value when playing Borderlands 3 than Core i9-9920X - $0.1 vs $2.17 per FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Core i9-9920X - 54 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Buy for €476.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 141 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
199
90%
Value, €/FPS
€0.1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€18.92
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €18.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 140 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9920X | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
165 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |