Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9920X outperforms the cheaper FX-8370 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8370 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9920X is 1508 days newer than the cheaper FX-8370.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9920X
- Performs up to 15% better in Lost Ark than FX-8370 - 257 vs 224 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8370 - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8370
- Up to 17% cheaper than Core i9-9920X - $181.35 vs $219.47
- Up to 5% better value when playing Lost Ark than Core i9-9920X - $0.9 vs $0.95 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-9920X - 125 vs 165 Watts
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
257
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.95/FPS
94.73684210526316%
Price, €
€243.61
82%
FPS Winner
Buy for €243.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1803 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
FPS
224
87.15953307392996%
Value, €/FPS
€0.9/FPS
100%
Price, €
€201.3
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €201.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1800 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9920X | vs | AMD FX-8370 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Skylake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |