Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9920X outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9920X is 2187 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9920X
- Performs up to 12% better in Borderlands 3 than FX-4300 - 220 vs 196 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i9-9920X - $35.11 vs $219.47
- Up to 82% better value when playing Borderlands 3 than Core i9-9920X - $0.2 vs $1.11 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i9-9920X - 95 vs 165 Watts
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
220
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.11/FPS
18.01801801801802%
Price, €
€243.61
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for €243.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 256 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
196
89.0909090909091%
Value, €/FPS
€0.2/FPS
100%
Price, €
€38.97
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €38.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 255 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9920X | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Skylake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |