Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3450 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3450 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900X is 2364 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3450.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900X
- Performs up to 12% better in Ready or Not than Core i5-3450 - 269 vs 240 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450 - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i9-9900X - $69.47 vs $406.54
- Up to 81% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i9-9900X - $0.32 vs $1.68 per FPS
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900X - 77 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
269
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.68/FPS
19%
Price, €
€451.26
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for €451.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10070 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
240
89%
Value, €/FPS
€0.32/FPS
100%
Price, €
€77.11
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €77.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10064 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900X | vs | Intel Core i5-3450 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |