Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms the cheaper Core i9-9900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-9900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 1173 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-9900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900X
- Up to 21% cheaper than Core i5-12400F - $431.41 vs $548.39
- Up to 20% better value when playing Dishonored 2 than Core i5-12400F - $1.8 vs $2.24 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400F - 20 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 2% better in Dishonored 2 than Core i9-9900X - 272 vs 266 FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900X - 65 vs 165 Watts
Dishonored 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
266
97%
Value, €/FPS
€1.8/FPS
100%
Price, €
€478.86
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €478.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 144 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
272
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.24/FPS
80%
Price, €
€608.71
78%
FPS Winner
Buy for €608.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 143 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900X | vs | Intel Core i5-12400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |