Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900X is 435 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900X
- Performs up to 9% better in Starfield than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 60 vs 55 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 165 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 55% cheaper than Core i9-9900X - $182.8 vs $406.54
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9900X - 24 vs 20 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €451.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75917 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
55
91.66666666666666%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€202.91
100%
Buy for €202.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75918 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1174
78.89784946236558%
Multi-Core
6976
73.30811265237494%
Intel Core i9-9900X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Skylake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 12 |
20 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |