Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900X is 435 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900X
- Performs up to 4% better in Ready or Not than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 269 vs 259 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 165 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i9-9900X - $196.68 vs $460.65
- Up to 56% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i9-9900X - $0.84 vs $1.9 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9900X - 24 vs 20 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €511.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 125 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
259
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.84/FPS
100%
Price, €
€218.32
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €218.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 126 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Skylake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 12 |
20 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |