Buy on Amazon
€295.07
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $423
Availability
MSRP in USD: $423
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900F outperforms the more expensive Core i9-9900T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900F is 373 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-9900T.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 1% better in Monster Hunter: World than Core i9-9900T - 260 vs 257 FPS
- Up to 36% cheaper than Core i9-9900T - $168.91 vs $265.83
- Up to 37% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Core i9-9900T - $0.72 vs $1.15 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9900T - 20 vs 16 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core I9-9900T ES QQC0 CPU 1.7GHz 16MB 35W 8 Cores 16 Thread 14nm 9thGeneration CPU LGA1151 for I9 9900T
Buy for €295.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 269 minutes ago
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
260
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.72/FPS
100%
Price, €
€187.49
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i9-10900F Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.2 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for €187.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 270 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i9-9900T
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900T | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 10 |
| 16 | Threads | 20 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.