Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-13700F outperforms the more expensive Core i9-9900T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-13700F is 1352 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-9900T.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900T
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-13700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 18% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-9900T - 206 vs 175 FPS
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i9-9900T - $213.74 vs $405.12
- Up to 55% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-9900T - $1.15 vs $2.57 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9900T - 24 vs 16 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
175
84.9514563106796%
Value, €/FPS
€2.57/FPS
44.74708171206226%
Price, €
€449.68
52%
Buy for €449.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1579 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
206
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€237.25
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €237.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1584 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Single-Core
1433
53.85193536264562%
Multi-Core
5994
38.733441033925686%
Intel Core i9-9900T | vs | Intel Core i7-13700F |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |