Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900T outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900T is 373 days older than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i9-9900T - $71.05 vs $405.12
- Up to 67% better value when playing Diablo IV than Core i9-9900T - $0.41 vs $1.25 per FPS
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €449.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
194
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.41/FPS
100%
Price, €
€78.87
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €78.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900T | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |