Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-9900T outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-9900T is 621 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900T
- Performs up to 11% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 368 vs 332 FPS
- Up to 23% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $405.12 vs $527.88
- Up to 31% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $1.22 vs $1.76 per FPS
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9900T - 32 vs 16 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
368
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€449.68
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €449.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5098 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
332
90%
Value, €/FPS
€1.76/FPS
69%
Price, €
€585.95
76%
Buy for €585.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5096 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900T | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |