Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900T outperforms the cheaper FX-9370 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-9370 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900T is 2142 days newer than the cheaper FX-9370.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900T
- Performs up to 28% better in Dirt 5 than FX-9370 - 182 vs 142 FPS
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD FX-9370 - 35 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9370 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-9370
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i9-9900T - $141.8 vs $405.12
- Up to 55% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i9-9900T - $1.11 vs $2.47 per FPS
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
182
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.47/FPS
44.93927125506073%
Price, €
€449.68
35%
FPS Winner
Buy for €449.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1587 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
142
78.02197802197803%
Value, €/FPS
€1.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€157.4
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €157.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1582 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900T | vs | AMD FX-9370 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 220 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |