Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900T outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900T is 211 days older than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900T
- Performs up to 4% better in God of War than Athlon 3000G - 174 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i9-9900T - $72.23 vs $405.12
- Up to 81% better value when playing God of War than Core i9-9900T - $0.48 vs $2.58 per FPS
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
174
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.58/FPS
18.6046511627907%
Price, €
€449.68
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for €449.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1836 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
168
96.55172413793103%
Value, €/FPS
€0.48/FPS
100%
Price, €
€80.17
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €80.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1836 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
66.78297278436845%
Multi-Core
1975
32.94961628294962%
Intel Core i9-9900T | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Athlon |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |