Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10900K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900KS is 185 days older than the cheaper Core i9-10900K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KS
- Performs up to 1% better in No Man's Sky than Core i9-10900K - 183 vs 182 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i9-9900KS - $314.41 vs $1454.34
- Up to 78% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i9-9900KS - $1.92 vs $8.82 per FPS
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KS - 125 vs 127 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9900KS - 20 vs 16 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2019
FPS
183
100%
Value, €/FPS
€8.82/FPS
21%
Price, €
€1614.32
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,614.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 169 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
182
99%
Value, €/FPS
€1.92/FPS
100%
Price, €
€349
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €349 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 169 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900KS | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Oct 28th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
127 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |