Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-12100F outperforms the more expensive Core i9-9900KS on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-12100F is 820 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-9900KS.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 2% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i9-9900KS - 184 vs 181 FPS
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i9-9900KS - $62.14 vs $402.15
- Up to 85% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i9-9900KS - $0.37 vs $2.47 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KS - 58 vs 127 Watts
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €446.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
184
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.37/FPS
100%
Price, €
€68.97
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €68.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900KS | vs | Intel Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Oct 28th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
127 W | TDP | 58 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |