Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KS outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900KS is 573 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KS
- Performs up to 80% better in FIFA 23 than Celeron G4900 - 189 vs 105 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i9-9900KS - $49.74 vs $391.19
- Up to 77% better value when playing FIFA 23 than Core i9-9900KS - $0.53 vs $2.3 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KS - 54 vs 127 Watts
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2019
FPS
189
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.3/FPS
23%
Price, €
€434.22
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for €434.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 139 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
105
55%
Value, €/FPS
€0.53/FPS
100%
Price, €
€55.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €55.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 138 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900KS | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Oct 28th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
127 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |