Buy on Amazon
€1,216.62
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $513
Availability
MSRP in USD: $513
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KS outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900KS is 2938 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KS
- Performs up to 17% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-8150 - 195 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 95% cheaper than Core i9-9900KS - $59.97 vs $1096.05
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KS - 125 vs 127 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Intel Core i9-9900KS Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 5.0GHz All-Core Turbo Unlocked LGA1151 Z390 127W
Buy for €1,216.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76691 minutes ago
AMD FX-Series FX-8150 FX8150 Desktop CPU Socket AM3 938 FD8150FRW8KGU FD8150FRGUBOX 8MB
Buy for €66.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76690 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i9-9900KS
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2019
FX-8150
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900KS | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
|---|---|---|
Oct 28th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| Core i9 | Collection | FX |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 127 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.