Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-9900KF outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-1650 v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 932 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 4% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 209 vs 201 FPS
- Up to 80% cheaper than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - $212.05 vs $1041.95
- Up to 80% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - $1.13 vs $5.75 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 95 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 16 vs 12 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
209
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€235.37
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €235.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 33795 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
201
96.17224880382776%
Value, €/FPS
€5.75/FPS
19.652173913043477%
Price, €
€1156.56
20%
Buy for €1,156.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 33792 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1180
69.7811945594323%
Multi-Core
5480
68.0491742207873%
Intel Core i9-9900KF | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |