Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 2507 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 3% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than FX-6200 - 184 vs 178 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 16 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i9-9900KF - $31.32 vs $208.4
- Up to 84% better value when playing Crysis 3 Remastered than Core i9-9900KF - $0.2 vs $1.26 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
184
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.26/FPS
15%
Price, €
€231.32
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for €231.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 113 minutes ago
Buy for €34.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 112 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900KF | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 3 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |