Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 1502 days newer than Xeon E5-2650 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 19% better in Far Cry 3 than Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 152 vs 128 FPS
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 95 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
152
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€328.7
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €328.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5194 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900K | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Core i9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
8 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |