Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 851 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 4% better in Rocket League than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 730 vs 705 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 95 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i9-9900K - $57.05 vs $296.13
- Up to 80% better value when playing Rocket League than Core i9-9900K - $0.09 vs $0.45 per FPS
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Buy for €328.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3339 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
705
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.09/FPS
100%
Price, €
€63.32
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €63.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3339 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900K | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |